Hi individuals, welcome back to one more video from Huge Jeffries. Today, I will certainly be diving right into the globe of fake mobile phones by analyzing a Galaxy S22 Ultra clone I bought from AliExpress. Valued at simply $123 for the 256GB model with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, certainly, not a genuine Samsung device. The question remains: can this knockoff competitor the big brand names, or is there even more to uncover?

First Perceptions

The phone is promoted with excellent specs, including 16-megapixel cameras, a 6,800 mAh battery, and a 10-core MediaTek 6889 cpu. It also guarantees an attribute dubbed “Rubik’s Cube technology.” Fascinated by these cases, I bought one to see for myself. After all, that wouldn’t want a phone with Rubik’s Dice innovation?

Upon arrival, the phone was available in a simple black box identified S22 Ultra. Inside, I located the phone, a flimsy S Pen that does not fit inside the device, a clear instance, a spare display protector, a lightweight and suspicious battery charger, a USB-C cable television, headphones, a SIM adapter, and a manual. The addition of an earphone jack was a pleasurable surprise, yet the overstated claim of 32 million cams was plainly just a translation mistake– or was it?

Checking the Specs

Turning the phone on, I headed directly to the “Concerning Phone” area. It revealed an S22 Ultra with 8GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, a 10-core Snapdragon processor, recycle laptops and repair strategy Android 11. Nonetheless, having come across phony specifications in various other Chinese phones, I was hesitant. My experience with an imitation iPhone 13 Pro duplicate, where every spec was phony, educated me not to trust appearances.

Before diving deeper, fast computer repair I chose to test the fingerprint scanner. Setting it up was straightforward, however when it involved opening the phone, any kind of finger– and even a knuckle– worked. It came to be clear that the phone did not have an actual fingerprint scanner; it just bypassed the lock display when you touched the assigned location.

Checking Out Pre-installed Apps

I wondered regarding the pre-installed applications like Facebook, Netflix, and TikTok. Were they genuine? A weird message in the TikTok settings declaring the app would certainly not infringe on customer passions raised my suspicions. After verifying with a buddy using a real Galaxy S22 Ultra, I verified the message was authentic. Trying to update TikTok via an APK file failed, making me careful of its legitimacy.

The sketchiness really did not end there. The web browser application, disguised as Google Chrome, asked for authorizations to take images, document audio, and accessibility get in touches with. Declining these approvals collapsed the app, more cementing my skepticism.

Uncovering the Fact

Established to discover the fact, I utilized Quick Shortcut Maker to discover covert applications. It really did not take long to find an application by King Send Time named “Gadget Information.” Opening it exposed the actual specs: a MediaTek MT-6580 processor from 2016, Android 8.1, a 480p display, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of storage– far from the marketed specs.

Another app, “Change App” by KST, permitted me to alter the gadget’s presented specifications. This application is utilized by scammers to phony the phone’s specifications, making it show up a lot more effective than it is. With a few taps, I changed the phone into an “S40 Ultra” with ludicrous specs, though these changes were simply aesthetic.

Investigating Better

Digging deeper, I uncovered that the phone’s IMEI number matched that of a genuine Galaxy S22 Ultra, showing they likely duplicated a reputable IMEI. This deception encompassed the hardware; opening the phone revealed that 3 of the 4 electronic cameras were fake. The real battery capacity was around 2,200 mAh, a plain 32% of the marketed 6,800 mAh.

Reassembly and Verdict

After documenting the actual specifications and taking a good appearance inside, I reconstructed the phone. Regardless of its outside look, this tool is a testimony to misleading marketing and shady business practices. It’s a contemporary item of e-waste, packaged with lies.

In an attempt to solve this, I contacted the vendor, offering proof of the phone’s fraudulent nature. They continued to be uncooperative. I will proceed with obtaining a reimbursement since no fraudster deserves my money.

This has actually been a Big Jeffries video clip. If you enjoyed this, struck the subscribe switch and have a look at the scam-busting playlist for more videos similar to this. If you remain in the marketplace for utilized devices, see my on the internet store linked in the summary. Many thanks for enjoying, and I’ll capture you following time!

Valued at just $123 for the 256GB version with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, of course, not an authentic Samsung tool. Upon arrival, the phone came in an ordinary black box identified S22 Ultra. Inside, I found the phone, a flimsy S Pen that doesn’t fit inside the tool, repair strategy a clear situation, a spare screen guard, a light-weight and suspicious battery charger, a USB-C cord, headphones, a SIM adapter, and a guidebook. Turning the phone on, I headed directly to the “Concerning Phone” area. Digging much deeper, I uncovered that the phone’s IMEI number matched that of a real Galaxy S22 Ultra, showing they most likely cloned a legit IMEI.